爆破卸压作用下深部巷道锚固承载稳定性分析——以中煤新集板集煤矿?735m轨道一石门为例
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

安徽建筑大学安徽省岩土工程智能建造与灾变防控重点实验室

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

TD 32

基金项目:

国家自然科学(52374073);安徽省自然科学基金资助项目(2508085Y035);河南省高等学校重点科研项目(25B560015);河南省科技研发计划联合基金项目(252103810025)


Analysis of the Bearing Stability of Anchors in Deep Tunnels Under Blasting-Induced Pressure Relief: A Case Study of the No. 1 Stone Gate on the ?735 m Track at the Zhongmei Xinjie Banjie Coal Mine
Author:
Affiliation:

Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Geotechnics and Disaster Prevention, Anhui Jianzhu University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    深部高应力软岩巷道在长期服役过程中易发生持续变形,常规支护返修后仍可能出现围岩破坏和支护构件失效,针对深部巷道原支护方案若干次返修后变形破坏仍持续发生等问题,开展了围岩变形破坏分析,新增了爆破卸压返修方案并进行了现场试验,在此基础上,将锚固围岩等效为承载拱,综合考虑巷道几何参数、围岩强度、锚杆支护参数以及爆破应力波传播衰减特征,建立底脚爆破动载作用下锚固承载结构力学模型,推导了爆破卸压锚固承载稳定力学判据。研究结果表明:1) 原方案返修后变形破坏仍持续发生,严重破坏区距巷道平均3.44m,主要是原支护方案没有解决高应力持续作用等瓶颈,使得巷道无法长期保持稳定;2) 采用爆破卸压返修方案后,形成了半径范围约0.6~1m的裂隙带,振动监测数据处于规定范围内,未对巷道产生震动冲击破坏,帮部、肩部、底板和顶板位移降低率分别为75.85%、60.92%、59.76%和81.15%,围岩得到显著控制;3) 影响因素算例分析表明,稳定力学判据η与围岩黏聚力、锚杆长度、锚杆工作荷载及爆破深度呈正相关,与巷道当量半径、锚杆间距及爆破震动峰值呈负相关,其中锚杆长度的影响最为显著;4)不同巷道对应的力学判据η变化范围不同,以本文基础参数为参照标准,力学判据η主要变化范围为(0,0.2),基准参考值约为0.15,可划分为严重影响区(0,0.05)、中等影响区(0.05,0.1)、一般影响区(0.1,0.15)和力学稳定区(0.15,0.2)四个区间,并提出了相应的对应措施。研究成果可为后续爆破卸压设计提供指导。

    Abstract:

    Deep, high-stress soft-rock tunnels are prone to sustained deformation during long-term operation; even following repairs to conventional support systems, rock mass failure and support component failure may still occur. In response to issues such as the persistent occurrence of deformation and failure in deep tunnels following several rounds of repairs to the original support scheme, an analysis of rock mass deformation and failure was conducted. A new blasting-induced stress relief repair scheme was introduced and field trials were conducted. On this basis, the anchored rock mass was modelled as a load-bearing arch. Taking into account the tunnel’s geometric parameters, rock mass strength, anchor support parameters and the propagation and attenuation characteristics of blasting stress waves, a mechanical model of the anchored load-bearing structure under dynamic loads from footwall blasting was established, and a mechanical criterion for the stability of the anchored load-bearing capacity under blasting-induced stress relief was derived. The research findings indicate that: 1) Following the refurbishment of the original scheme, deformation and failure continued to occur; the zone of severe damage was located an average of 3.44 m from the tunnel, primarily because the original support scheme had failed to address bottlenecks such as the sustained application of high stresses, thereby preventing the tunnel from maintaining long-term stability; 2) Following the implementation of the blasting pressure relief repair scheme, a fracture zone with a radius of approximately 0.6–1 m was formed. Vibration monitoring data remained within the specified limits, and no vibration-induced impact damage occurred in the tunnel. The reduction rates in displacement for the side walls, shoulders, floor and roof were 75.85 per cent, 60.92 per cent, 59.76 per cent and 81.15 per cent respectively, indicating that the surrounding rock was effectively stabilised; 3) Analysis of case studies on influencing factors indicates that the stability mechanical criterion η is positively correlated with the cohesion of the surrounding rock, anchor length, working load of the anchors and blasting depth, and negatively correlated with the equivalent radius of the tunnel, anchor spacing and peak blasting vibration. Among these factors, anchor length has the most significant influence; 4) The range of variation in the mechanical criterion η differs for different roadways. Using the basic parameters in this paper as a reference standard, the main range of variation for the mechanical criterion η is (0, 0.2), with a benchmark reference value of approximately 0.15. This range can be divided into four intervals: the severely affected zone (0, 0.05), the moderately affected zone (0.05, 0.1), moderate impact zone (0.1, 0.15) and mechanically stable zone (0.15, 0.2), and corresponding measures have been proposed. The research findings can provide guidance for subsequent blasting stress relief design.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

潘锐,曹先航,杜宝宝,等. 爆破卸压作用下深部巷道锚固承载稳定性分析——以中煤新集板集煤矿?735m轨道一石门为例[J]. 科学技术与工程, , ():

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-18
  • 最后修改日期:2026-08-06
  • 录用日期:2026-09-09
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
×
关于抵制伪造参考文献学术不端行为的声明
关于规范使用生成式人工智能的声明
喜报|《科学技术与工程》3篇论文成功入选 “第二十八届中国科协年会影响力提名论文”
2026年会通知 | “技术经济学驱动智能经济生态构建与治理变革”——中国技术经济学会第三十三届学术年会(2026)会议通知暨征文启事(第一轮)
亟待确认版面费归属稿件,敬请作者关注